potus typographicus III

It seems we’ve come a long way since the embarass­ing typo­graph­i­cal blun­ders of the Bush (43) admin­is­tra­tion. Sen­a­tor Obama’s signs are taste­fully ren­dered in clas­sic Per­petua and mod­ern Gotham (the GQ Mag­a­zine font). Sen­a­tor McCain’s signs are cleanly set in Optima, a titling font pop­u­lar in the 1970s and famous for its use on the Viet­nam Veteran’s Memo­r­ial. Both cam­paigns should be com­mended for their atten­tion to design. But the other day I got to think­ing: why such a bland color palette? I under­stand the sig­nif­i­cance of red, white, and blue, but must they (in their most basic shades) be the only suit­ably patri­otic choices for cam­paign art?

On the Web I found a nice com­pi­la­tion of pres­i­den­tial cam­paign logos from 1960 to present. As you can see, the only can­di­date to ever depart from the flag triad and win is Jimmy Carter. But I sup­pose it is under­stand­able that nobody wants to fol­low his lead.

4 Comments

  1. shazam October 31, 2008

    I’m a bit sur­prised that you come down so evenly on the design choices of the two cam­paigns: I’ve often thought to myself that, were the elec­tion a graphic design con­test, this would not be a close race.  Obama would win, hands down.  We’re talk­ing land­slide.  His peo­ple deserve an enor­mous amount of praise for the coher­ence and style of their graphic iden­tity (for an iden­tity it cer­tainly is), which has con­sis­tently bowled me over through­out the race.  They clearly under­stand the impor­tance of good design: their atten­tion to these mat­ters shows, and as some­one who appre­ci­ates good, thought­ful design, I have been pleased again and again.

    McCain’s cam­paign, on the other hand, while as you rightly point out has been con­sis­tent in its look and clean in its style, suf­fers from an ini­tial hand­i­cap: his yellow-starburst logo­type hear­kens (a bit too much for this viewer) to the McCain Foods logo­type.  Every time I see a McCain (or, now, McCain-Palin) sign, I think of french fries.  This res­o­nance may be lim­ited to us design geeks who for some rea­son remem­ber com­pany logo­types regard­less of whether or not we buy their prod­ucts, or who have worked in design enough to have the impor­tance of brand­ing and graphic iden­tity drilled into their adver­tis­ing world­view, but I sus­pect that it might be wider.  This is exactly the sort of nit­picky detail that a graphic designer for any major com­pany (or polit­i­cal cam­paign) is being paid to think about, and to me it just sug­gests that McCain’s design team wasn’t doing its job from the get-go.  If we haven’t by now all learned that (for bet­ter or for worse) this polit­i­cal cam­paign­ing stuff is as much PR as it is pol­icy, we haven’t been pay­ing any attention.

    It is fair, though, to say (as you do) that they have done a good job with what they started out with, main­tain­ing con­ti­nu­ity of design with the blue-and-yellow star theme (and, as I note upon vis­it­ing the McCain cam­paign web­site for the first time in a long while while writ­ing this post, even using some very sim­i­lar designs to the Obama web site, in terms of font choice etc.), and per­haps I should give them more credit than I have.  (Their graphic iden­tity has, at the very least, been more con­sis­tent than their cam­paign mes­sage!)  But in the end I have to say: I just don’t like their logo­type or their theme.  It’s bor­ing, unin­ter­est­ing, uno­rig­i­nal… and Optima makes me think of Lech­mere, not the Viet­nam Memo­r­ial.  In the end, it just can’t hold a can­dle to the Obama campaign’s truly stel­lar graphic design work.  (I mean, look at the web site.  It’s really, really good.  On pretty much every design count.)

    The Cooper-Hewitt won’t be knockin’ on the McCain camp’s door.  Is all I’m sayin’.

  2. Scott October 31, 2008

    I agree com­pletely! Obama’s cam­paign clearly wins on style and your point about the McCain Foods logo is well-made. I was think­ing mostly about how rapidly stan­dards seem to have evolved since a Hillary Clin­ton photo got me fired up about this sub­ject 2.5 years ago.

  3. MRhé October 31, 2008

    Obama cer­tainly has won in terms of branding/marketing – at least accord­ing to AdAge. And their cam­paign has been bril­liant on all counts, speak­ing strictly as a marketeer.

    How did I know that Amrys would be all up ons the com­ments on this entry?

  4. shazam October 31, 2008

    Heh.  Yeah, I guess I’d been wait­ing for an excuse to let that one rip.  For­tu­nately, I can always count on Scot­toway to set me up.

Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

October 31, 2008 October 31, 2008 observations by Scott [permanent link]