2008 Boston Yel­low Pages: 1451 pages
2009 Boston Yel­low Pages: 1075 pages

December 31, 2008 December 31, 2008 observations by Scott 3 Comments

May you all have a very merry Christmas!

December 25, 2008 December 25, 2008 friends by Scott No Comments

Christ­mas means trav­el­ing with two bags. I arrived at the air­port for my first expe­ri­ence in this checked-baggage-not-included world. To my sur­prise, they have not installed cash reg­is­ters at the ticket counter! So how does a guy who uses a credit card only for large pur­chases check lug­gage on Delta Air Lines? Fol­low these easy steps:

  1. Iden­tify your­self to an auto­mated kiosk.
  2. When prompted for num­ber of bags to check, touch “1”.
  3. The next screen asks you to swipe your credit card now to be charged $15. You never said you wanted to pay by credit card, so touch “cancel.”
  4. When prompted for num­ber of bags to check, touch “1” again.
  5. When asked again to swipe your credit card, call for human assis­tance. Ask where the cash option is.
  6. Human will advise that the only way out is to choose “0” bags (an option now help­fully labeled “Free!”).
  7. Approach counter with bag to check. Iden­tify your­self to counter agent.
  8. Agent will scan board­ing pass 3–5 times before declar­ing it unusual that the com­puter will not per­mit her to check your bag. Wait for a super­vi­sor to reach the same con­clu­sion before ask­ing, “Is it because I declared zero bags at the kiosk?”
  9. Agent will accom­pany you back to the kiosk to mod­ify your check-in.
  10. Agent will advise you to again select “1” bag, but this time to answer “yes” when it asks whether the lug­gage con­tains sport­ing goods, live ani­mals, dry ice or firearms, even if it does not. “I real­ize there’s no way you would have known that,” she will add.
  11. A help­ful pop-up screen will now advise you to see an agent at the counter.
  12. Return to counter with the agent. Pro­duce $20 bill.
  13. Agent says she will be right back and car­ries the money to the back room.
  14. Smile help­fully at the peo­ple behind you in line.
  15. Agent returns in 5–7 min­utes, hav­ing com­pleted the nec­es­sary paper­work to make $5 in change, and you are on your way. What could be easier?

December 24, 2008 December 24, 2008 travel by Scott No Comments

I knew some­thing was amiss when I awoke to find that the breeze from my slightly open win­dow was uncom­fort­ably cold. The heat stopped work­ing overnight. Hav­ing made a spe­cial effort to be up early to run errands, I was furi­ous to dis­cover that the hot water was also out. There are two things in this world which, if missed, will make me instantly irri­ta­ble: meals and show­ers. I ate breakfast.

I started call­ing the land­lord. The boiler in my build­ing dates back to approx­i­mately the time of James Watt, so one or two major mechan­i­cal fail­ures per year is cus­tom­ary. The sys­tem closely resem­bles Frankenstein’s lab­o­ra­tory. Wires, bare and cloth-insulated, twist and turn like vines along walls. The win­dows of gauges and sight glasses are mot­tled by the accu­mu­lated crust of decades. Obso­lete parts are bypassed but left in place. Unable to trou­bleshoot it myself, I call hourly for sta­tus updates. I found it curi­ous that it was tak­ing hours to dis­patch a repair­man. What could pos­si­bly be wrong this time?

The answer became clear after lunch when the “repair­man” finally showed up, not with a tool­box but with a tanker truck. Who lets their tank of heat­ing oil run dry!?!

December 21, 2008 December 21, 2008 rants by Scott 1 Comment

As I biked past my neigh­bor­hood Sub­way restau­rant last night I spot­ted what has become a strangely com­mon sight in down­town Boston: a bat­tery of lights set up on the side­walk, blast­ing at the front win­dow. A hand­ful of grip trucks and a makeup trailer were parked outside.

Scrims and flags and light­ing stands blocked my view of what was going on inside—needless to say they were closed for business—but rumor has it that if I had stuck around a lit­tle longer, I would have seen Michael Phelps shoot­ing a Super Bowl commercial.

December 16, 2008 December 16, 2008 observations by Scott 1 Comment

This week the gov­er­nor of New York pro­poses an “obe­sity tax” on soft drinks. Good for him! Finan­cial incen­tives for good behav­ior work, and I’m sure the state can use the extra revenue.

Unfor­tu­nately it seems like Gov. Pater­son intends to draw a line between diet and non-diet drinks, choos­ing to tax only non-diet sodas. Mak­ing such a dis­tinc­tion seems to con­vey the mes­sage that diet sodas are some­how health­ier than their non-diet coun­ter­parts. A gov­ern­ment endorse­ment of arti­fi­cial sweet­en­ers like aspar­tame (Nutrasweet) is inap­pro­pri­ate with­out sci­en­tific con­sen­sus. And as of this writ­ing, the sci­ence is inconclusive.

Most peo­ple would agree that soda is unhealthy, so why not tax all soda?

December 15, 2008 December 15, 2008 in-the-news by Scott No Comments

Quoth the New York Times: “And yet, Mr. Blago­je­vich, 52, rarely turns up for work at his offi­cial state office in Chicago, for­mer employ­ees say, is unapolo­get­i­cally late to almost every­thing, and can treat employ­ees with dis­dain, curs­ing and erupt­ing in fury for fail­ings as mun­dane as neglect­ing to have at hand at all times his pre­ferred black Paul Mitchell hair­brush. He calls the brush ‘the foot­ball,’ an allu­sion to the ‘nuclear foot­ball,’ or the bomb codes never to be out of reach of a president.”

So, Illi­nois: you voted for this guy?

December 14, 2008 December 14, 2008 in-the-news by Scott 3 Comments

I proudly sub­scribe to LensWork, the only pho­tog­ra­phy mag­a­zine focused entirely on pho­tographs (as opposed to cam­eras). The edi­tor, Brooks Jensen, has a keen eye, tremen­dous expe­ri­ence, and never takes sides on point­less issues. For the longest time, the mag­a­zine was adamant that their spe­cial edi­tion reprints were real pho­to­graphic prints, not lith­o­graphs, and cer­tainly not inkjet prints.

So it is trou­bling to this young lud­dite, so fond of mak­ing his own B&W prints in the dark­room, to read the results of Mr. Jensen’s tests with the lat­est crop of fancy inkjet print­ers and coated inkjet photo paper: “They are every bit as good as the gelatin sil­ver paper I printed on for years. In fact, the Dmax black den­si­ties are even greater than I was able to repro­duce in the dark­room with selenium-toned prints! The sur­face tex­tures are lovely… The ‘feel’ of them is just wonderful.”

There you have it. In the short time since I took up pho­tog­ra­phy, I have watched dig­i­tal tech­nolo­gies equal or sur­pass sil­ver at a num­ber of met­rics. First in res­o­lu­tion. Then at noise. Then dynamic range. And now falls the print. The sig­nif­i­cance is less about ana­log vs. dig­i­tal than about what makes a “fine art” print so desir­able. A gelatin sil­ver print hang­ing in an art museum was almost cer­tainly exposed from an orig­i­nal, one-of-a-kind neg­a­tive in the artist’s dark­room, burned and dodged with light shaped by the artist’s own hands. Now black-and-white pho­tog­ra­phy enters an era in which machine repro­duc­tions are equal to or bet­ter than what we cur­rently call the “real thing.”

How will we value art when time-consuming and expen­sive orig­i­nals become indis­tin­guish­able from copies? Will we need deal­ers? Will we need muse­ums? The music indus­try is already ask­ing sim­i­lar ques­tions, but at least they will always have the live performance.

December 7, 2008 December 7, 2008 observations by Scott 1 Comment